Meaning doesn’t just pop into existence. It’s forged through the messy process of grappling with disparate experiences, emotions, and knowledge until they coalesce into a narrative that makes sense of the world—and our place in it. As Iain McGilchrist explains in The Master and His Emissary, this process relies on a delicate dance between the brain’s two hemispheres:
When these two work in tandem, meaning emerges. But our modern tech-drenched world tilts the scales. Platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and even Amazon favor instant certainty and frictionless efficiency, feeding the left hemisphere’s hunger for control while starving the right hemisphere’s need for ambiguity and connection.
Picture a late-night TikTok binge: a barrage of auto-playing videos, each vying for attention, each designed to be forgotten the moment you swipe. There’s no room to dwell, no space for reflection—just a dopamine-fueled conveyor belt of fleeting half-experiences. Even mundane tasks like online grocery shopping strip away the serendipity of stumbling upon an unfamiliar spice or chatting with the cashier. We gain speed and convenience, but we lose the depth that makes life rich and meaningful.
Meaning-making is a dynamic process that pulls together cognition, emotion, personal history, and social context. It’s not just about thinking; it’s about feeling and connecting.
We humans are master storytellers—and sometimes unreliable narrators. Self-deception can protect us from harsh truths, but it can also trap us in shallow, unexamined narratives.
Moments of transcendence—whether through meditation, art, or even a vigorous hike—disrupt our routines and unlock new ways of connecting the dots. These altered states remind us that meaning isn’t static; it’s rediscovered, often in the most unexpected places.
Meaning-making thrives on tension: between certainty and doubt, simplicity and complexity. Wisdom emerges when we stop rushing to resolve contradictions and instead sit with them, letting deeper insights unfold.
Ambiguity is uncomfortable, sure—but it’s also necessary. Without the friction of the unknown, there’s no creativity, no empathy, no real understanding. Yet modern life trains us to flee from ambiguity, replacing it with neat, algorithmically curated answers.
Technology has always shaped how we think and connect. The printing press democratized knowledge while sparking debates about its impact on deep thought. The industrial revolution brought efficiency but also existential discontent. Thinkers like Marshall McLuhan and Jacques Ellul warned that new tools don’t just add convenience; they reshape how we perceive the world and our place in it.
Today’s digital tools operate on an unprecedented scale and speed. Smartphones and AI flood us with information, fragmenting our attention and amplifying the tension between ease and depth. We’ve gone from wrestling with ideas to skimming sound bites.
Daniel Kahneman’s System 1 (fast, reactive thinking) dominates when we’re bombarded with notifications and algorithmically curated content. This robs System 2—the slow, reflective part of our mind—of the space it needs to process and build meaning.
Context anchors meaning. Without it, experiences become fragments. Digital interactions often strip away these anchors, leaving us adrift in a sea of decontextualized memes, tweets, and headlines.
AI can generate astonishing art and poetry, but it lacks the human struggle that gives creations their layered significance. Without that messy backstory, these outputs are entertaining but hollow—a shadow of genuine depth.
Real connection demands navigating complexity—reading between the lines, tolerating differences, and sitting with discomfort. Digital platforms sanitize these interactions, offering “block” buttons and curated feeds instead of the messy work of real empathy.
Grappling with different worldviews enriches meaning-making. Frictionless tools like instant translation or tailored newsfeeds might smooth the path, but they also erase the cultural ambiguity that sparks real growth and respect.
Think of Joseph Campbell’s hero’s journey: the protagonist doesn’t grow by avoiding uncertainty but by confronting it head-on. We, too, need trials to challenge our assumptions and expand our perspectives.
Individualistic cultures often face a heightened crisis of meaning because they emphasize personal consumption and self-expression. Collectivist cultures, while sometimes more resistant to digital flattening, wrestle with their own tensions around conformity and censorship.
If we continue prioritizing frictionless convenience:
The frictionless path technology offers isn’t inherently bad—it’s just incomplete. To reclaim meaning, we need to reintroduce purposeful pauses, embrace the discomfort of ambiguity, and find depth in the messy middle. Let’s be skeptics of convenience and champions of curiosity. After all, meaning isn’t found on autopilot; it’s created in the deliberate, sometimes awkward, and always human act of connecting the dots.